Which initiatives depends on the future of La Maddalena ? From a broader vision linked to tourism development? From the disposal of state property and therefore their use by the public and private? From the archipelago of La Maddalena National Park? By urban development? I do not think any of the aforementioned hypothesis is, by itself or together with others, enough to create economic prosperity or a cultural growth of the population. In my opinion, the 'main initiative would to try to achieve a fixed link between the' island (Sarda) of La Maddalena and Sardinia. A bridge, a bridge-tunnel (allowing a greater speed and continuity of movements) would more easily to the citizens of La Maddalena, the opportunity to take advantage of the cultural village of the inappropriately named "dry land", of course, the converse. The same applies to be provided by residents of La Maddalena, the opportunity to work outside of 'archipelago. Are there any disadvantages? Perhaps the loss of jobs of seafarers and of 'induced, but this would be offset by those that would be obtained initially by the construction of the bridge or bridge-tunnel, then, management and maintenance. Also part of the fixed link made with a bridge (La Maddalena, Santo Stefano) could accommodate both sides of the small business business (crafts, jewelry stores, kiosk, belvedere pitches and more) by arranging jobs for others and thus transformed into a scenic walk. Another disadvantage could be represented by the largest influx of outside workers and from 'apparent decrease of business and craft but this is not true because if a business or artisan is well managed and has the ability to operate outside of the archipelago , should not have problems due to the competition as it should not have workers able to work in Olbia, La Maddalena, Temple, Arzachena Santa Teresa Palau and other places and then come back with more ease in which they reside. Another negative point is the hypothetical increase alleged crime due to the higher influx of people in our environment. What do we surround ourselves with the barbed wire? The other cities that are on the "mainland" have done? E 'inconceivable that the' output of the fixed link would be a funnel where potential criminals would go to hunt? Some say the nature of the island would unnatural, ugly , according to Venice with me the link to the "land" has not lost its charm, and if a bridge is built with certain features become paesiggisticamente qualifying and then a 'further tourist attraction. The hospital would not lose because of impôt temporally closer to that of Olbia, but because they would acquire would be more accessible by the people of Palau, Santa Teresa, and even becoming Arzachena really complements that of Olbia. Today La Maddalena import all the goods they need, buy it at much higher prices because of its insularity and the inhabitants are forced to spend more than a little of their time and money for each shift. Ovviabile This is only making a fixed connection between the two sides. I invite you to participate in this post with your opinions. The new PUC
of 2008 or 2009 in preparation provides a permanent connection only between the island of La Maddalena and Santo Stefano , this mainly to allow the movement of the commercial port in Santo Stefano in the former mooring the vessel in support of U.S. nuclear submarines. See floor plan is drawn up by the future PUC
0 comments:
Post a Comment